Comments on: What are you up to John Locke?

By: visit

visit — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:35:17 +0000

Lovely, informative site, thanks

By: liste casino france

liste casino france — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:51:50 +0000

The stuff on this web site is really witty and cool wise

By: Hammer

Hammer — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:45:52 +0000

Kudos to all of us who felt that Locke wasn’t being dumbed down by the writers and actually was sticking to character!

By: STU

STU — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:48:16 +0000

Lesley wrote:

so lost, you are right! John told Sayid that he was keeping Patchy alive. That could mean that Patchy told him something or that playing with the computer and his prior snooping gave him other information. Maybe John recognized Patchy from some prior “life”. And considering that John was in close proximity to Desmond when the failsafe happened why wouldn’t he also be able to see into the other timelines? But I do question why Ms. Klugh would not just off Patchy even if John was at risk. Is there some warped moral code that requires the Hostiles not take a life except under certain circumstances? I am betting that is the case. If you look at the encounters, even though they blew up the boat and shot Sawyer they give the Losties an opportunity to save themselves (excluding Pickett in that bunch). It seems to be the case with others encounters as well – They don’t shoot to kill. So maybe that is why Tom was so adamant when he asked Jack “what kind of people do you think we are”?

DOES ANYONE RECALL THAT THE OTHERS BELIEVE IN “AN EYE FOR AN EYE”? JUILETTE WAS TO BE KILLED FOR THE MURDER OF THE GUY WHEN KATE AND SAWYER WERE ESCAPING? INSTEAD THEY GAVE HER A NASTY BRANDING ON HER BACK. AND ARE THEY OTHERS THE “HOSTILES”? IF THE OTHERS WERE RUNNING MIKHAIL’S PLACE; WOULD THEY BE THE HOSTILES INDICATED IN THE “GAMING” SYSTEM JOHN PUNCHED 77 INTO? ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT ONE?

By: s stallsmith

s stallsmith — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:46:29 +0000

IF LOCKE’S DAD IS THE ONE THAT SAWYER IS LOOKING FOR….IS HE SAWYER’S DAD OR DID HE JUST CON SAWYER’S MOM? FILL ME IN; NEW TO THIS WEB STUFF ON LOST. I KNOW SAWYER KILLED THE WRONG GUY EARLIER IN THE SERIES; IS THIS RELATED ANY HELP WOULD BE HELPFUL, THXTO THE LETTER HE HAS CARRIED WITH HIM SINCE HE WAS A BOY?

By: Elise

Elise — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:01:17 +0000

Toeknee – that’s true, I guess I should explain myself better. I think that the different time streams might account for John being “on” the plane without actually being on it – if that makes any sense.

Although because I don’t understand well how the time travel thing works (in the Lost world) I can’t say for sure, and I’m inclined to believe he was on the plane and is not a spy.

Sorry for my logical flaw…I hate my own logical flaws too. *sheepish grin*

By: theOtherdave

theOtherdave — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:36:51 +0000

I don’t want to go in that direction of theories. As much as I think it could be fun.

By: theOtherdave

theOtherdave — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:35:09 +0000

XtraCripsy wrote:

Time is not linear on this island. The series could very well end with the crash of flight 815 will all passengers dying…

And what we see is just another timeline of reliving the past. I guess that could explain why the ‘physics’ of so many survivors in a really bad plane crash turned out the way it did- kinda incredible.
And then if this COULD be a possibility, then we return to the theory of living in hell / purgatory / another dimension, etc. All dependant on each persons perspective.

By: Toeknee

Toeknee — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:37:41 +0000

Elise, are you saying John was not on the plane? Different flashbacks have shown him on the plane, and in the airport (having a brief encounter with Rose).

By: Elise

Elise — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:18:26 +0000

To everyone who said that John Locke couldn’t be a spy for the Others or a Dharma worker because it seems too complicated to engineer a plane crash in which he survives, think about it for just a second. Goodwin wasn’t really in the plane crash, but he was a spy just the same. If Locke is a spy (which by the way I do NOT think he is) he could have just run onto the beach in the confusion and layed down as though he were one of the survivors.

Sorry, I just can’t stand logical flaws…