Comments on: Theory Competition Winners

By: Cecilia

Cecilia — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:20:49 +0000

Thanks to all who participated, and congrats to the winners.

By: KillerR

KillerR — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:38:05 +0000

All the theories I’ve read are very feasible. To me we are still at the point where anything is possible. Basically we know almost all of the “effects”, but very few “causes”. But, like all great works of art, the artist must establish an entire background before concentrating on the foreground.

So big ups to all of those that were brave enough to put themselves out there with such extensive theories. Its getting brutal out there.

By: mark

mark — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:22:35 +0000

the whole story is in someones mind while in a comma

By: Andreas

Andreas — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:33:49 +0000

mark wrote:

the whole story is in someones mind while in a comma

A bit to late to submit an entry, sorry mark ;)

By: Cecilia

Cecilia — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:56:31 +0000

mark: Sorry, that one is also discredited by the writers…

By: mike

mike — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:27:59 +0000

I like how none of the winners mention the smoke monster…

By: Pastor2churches

Pastor2churches — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:57:02 +0000

mike wrote:

I like how none of the winners mention the smoke monster…

Actually, mike, Lesley does.

By: Andreas

Andreas — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:29:29 +0000

mike wrote:

I like how none of the winners mention the smoke monster…

A theory that among other things discusses the smoke monster will be published tomorrow =)

There were some good theories that didn’t win because the ideas in them were already out there. We wanted some fresh perspectives on Lost, and I think the three winning theories all have that.