Comments on: Did Kate name Sawyer?

By: Ink Cartridge Review

Ink Cartridge Review — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:18:21 +0000

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often

By: kevin Jackson

kevin Jackson — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:38:57 +0000

Excellent article, I enjoy every article I read here. Thanks,
and keep bloggin!

By: LBK

LBK — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:50:54 +0000

I believe…that Kate was in Australia to begin with…on the behalf of Cassidy. To track Sawyer down, as payback for Cassidy helping her with her Mom in Iowa.

I think that all that we are seeing with Kate and Sawyer (and Im a skater so this particulary fascinates me) is the ULTIMATE long con on her part.

As Duckett told Sawyer…

” It’ll all come back around.”

By: Leslie

Leslie — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:38:55 +0000

I agree with Casyo that Locke’s father really is his father. They sought him out because the father needed a compatible donor.

In Season 1, I seem to recall Sawyer hinting several times that he knew something Kate’s background. But then maybe that was because he had observed her “in custody” while on the plane.

I don’t know if I buy that all these people are really in an institution, but I think they are all connected somehow, and they were all brought to the island for a reason.

By: Andreas

Andreas — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:30:25 +0000

Scott wrote:

Is Kate’s Dad also the on that was in the hatch with Desmond?

Nope, the man in the hatch, Kelvin, is not Kate’s father. Kate killed her real father and her adoptive father served in Iraq with Kelvin.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:55:53 +0000

Is Kate’s Dad also the on that was in the hatch with Desmond?

By: Sara

Sara — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:16:07 +0000

Neither. She definately didn’t name him, because he named himself that because he turned into the man that killed his father and mother and his name was “Sawyer”. Kate had nothing to do with that.

I agree with all others, hardly anyone, except Jack, was introduced on-screen. I am assuming that the writers expecting us to understand that they probably introduced eachother while not in a scene. Because obviously the character’s must have live’s off of the screen (i.e when they are filming Kate and Sawyer that does not mean that Jack and Hurley and Charlie no longer exist, that just means they are not being filmed), therefore we are to assume that they intruced eachother when we have not seen.

By: Cedric

Cedric — Thu, 11 May 2006 10:35:01 +0000

tracy wrote:

I am new to this! I have a theory, and am not sure if it’s been discussed. All of the survivors are in an institution, Locke is the Doctor. All of this is happening in their minds in a group study at the hospital. Far fetched, huh?

I hope it is not ! I hate this kind of story! I want real story and real action… Not doing all this searchs for nothing!

By: tracy

tracy — Thu, 11 May 2006 02:23:08 +0000

I am new to this! I have a theory, and am not sure if it’s been discussed. All of the survivors are in an institution, Locke is the Doctor. All of this is happening in their minds in a group study at the hospital. Far fetched, huh?

By: lewii

lewii — Wed, 10 May 2006 21:35:41 +0000

Tom wrote:

im doing this from memory but havent people called sawyer “sawyer” in flashbacks?

i think they have