<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air vents are for air</title>
	<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air</link>
	<description>Lost news, theories and discussion of ABC TV's Lost</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Tift</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1437</link>
		<author>Maurice Tift</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1437</guid>
					<description>The context sensitive ads are for duct cleaning today :) 

   I was just reading a web site with a list of what they called "insultingly stupid movie physics." It was pretty funny and I have always suspected that cars do not always explode on impact or after turning upside down in a crash. However, I fell for the large air ducts. I never really thought about the size - it's only now that I have searched and find that thieves have been frequently 'trapped' in air ducts - maybe they watched TV where the ducts are much bigger and more comfortable.  Anyway, at least it doesn't violate physics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The context sensitive ads are for duct cleaning today :) </p>
<p>   I was just reading a web site with a list of what they called &#8220;insultingly stupid movie physics.&#8221; It was pretty funny and I have always suspected that cars do not always explode on impact or after turning upside down in a crash. However, I fell for the large air ducts. I never really thought about the size - it&#8217;s only now that I have searched and find that thieves have been frequently &#8216;trapped&#8217; in air ducts - maybe they watched TV where the ducts are much bigger and more comfortable.  Anyway, at least it doesn&#8217;t violate physics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1438</link>
		<author>joe</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1438</guid>
					<description>john has a great point - because it's exactly a show like 'lost' that would incorporate and even make fun of this oft-used cliche. can't you just see the scene where sawyer tries to climb through a duct, only to find that it's six inches wide, and locke says "you've ben watching too many movies." 

i think the show is at its best when it subverts these things we've seen all too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john has a great point - because it&#8217;s exactly a show like &#8216;lost&#8217; that would incorporate and even make fun of this oft-used cliche. can&#8217;t you just see the scene where sawyer tries to climb through a duct, only to find that it&#8217;s six inches wide, and locke says &#8220;you&#8217;ve ben watching too many movies.&#8221; </p>
<p>i think the show is at its best when it subverts these things we&#8217;ve seen all too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LostHSV</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1440</link>
		<author>LostHSV</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1440</guid>
					<description>Am I the only one who thinks it is ironic that he would point out the irony of polar bears and mystery smoke yet question the believability of air ducts. I understand his point, but THE WHOLE THING IS FAKE which is why they call them actors! 

It's like complaining that Aslan looked fake in Narnia as if talking lions were normal. I think there can be a little too much scutiny at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks it is ironic that he would point out the irony of polar bears and mystery smoke yet question the believability of air ducts. I understand his point, but THE WHOLE THING IS FAKE which is why they call them actors! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like complaining that Aslan looked fake in Narnia as if talking lions were normal. I think there can be a little too much scutiny at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1444</link>
		<author>Lesley</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1444</guid>
					<description>We like to pick the show apart in order to figure out what is going on but it is fantasy.  I agree with LostHSV it is an escape for all of us when we watch (and watch again).  Not only that but we look for clues and participate in thoughtful blogs trying to fit all the parts together.  I am willing to dispense with a little "reality" now and again to enjoy the broad entertainment experience.  Just give me more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We like to pick the show apart in order to figure out what is going on but it is fantasy.  I agree with LostHSV it is an escape for all of us when we watch (and watch again).  Not only that but we look for clues and participate in thoughtful blogs trying to fit all the parts together.  I am willing to dispense with a little &#8220;reality&#8221; now and again to enjoy the broad entertainment experience.  Just give me more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1449</link>
		<author>annonymouse</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1449</guid>
					<description>maybe they're not airducts, but a series of inter-hatch transports only known by the others...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they&#8217;re not airducts, but a series of inter-hatch transports only known by the others&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnaugust.com &#187; Why I don&#8217;t have Google ads, part 432</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1469</link>
		<author>johnaugust.com &#187; Why I don&#8217;t have Google ads, part 432</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-1469</guid>
					<description>[...] While checking out the Technorati feeds, I noticed that the good folks over at LostBlog, mentioned my recent rant &#8220;Air vents are for air.&#8221; Naturally, the Google ad that followed the story was perfect for readers who wonder why cinematic air ducts are not only unrealistically large, but also surprisingly tidy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While checking out the Technorati feeds, I noticed that the good folks over at LostBlog, mentioned my recent rant &#8220;Air vents are for air.&#8221; Naturally, the Google ad that followed the story was perfect for readers who wonder why cinematic air ducts are not only unrealistically large, but also surprisingly tidy: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selwine</title>
		<link>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-3349</link>
		<author>selwine</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 19:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/air-vents-are-for-air#comment-3349</guid>
					<description>I love this site. Good work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this site. Good work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
