Comments on: A Theory on Dying http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying Lost news, theories and discussion of ABC TV's Lost Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:11:02 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Enik http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-371069 Enik Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:57:01 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-371069 Austen is number 51. Austen is number 51.

]]> By: LibbyAndrews http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-370481 LibbyAndrews Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:33:35 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-370481 I believe LOST is about Good Vs Evil and the Devil vs. God. Jacob is Good or God and Jeremy is Evil or the Devil. Jeremy turns into smoke (the serpent) and can take over dead bodies. THe people on flight 815 would have ended up there whether or not the flight had crashed because they are needed in the fight. Jacob (Good or god) can heal people, make them walk again etc.... Benjamin is like Peter - a disciple of Jacobs who then betrays him in the end (by stabbing him). I believe LOST is about Good Vs Evil and the Devil vs. God. Jacob is Good or God and Jeremy is Evil or the Devil. Jeremy turns into smoke (the serpent) and can take over dead bodies. THe people on flight 815 would have ended up there whether or not the flight had crashed because they are needed in the fight. Jacob (Good or god) can heal people, make them walk again etc…. Benjamin is like Peter – a disciple of Jacobs who then betrays him in the end (by stabbing him).

]]> By: christian louboutin http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-365936 christian louboutin Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:17:48 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-365936 I just wanted to tell you that I love the site(s). Makes me smile and makes my day everyday. Better than master card, I never leave home with out my daily dose.great site like <a href="http://www.christianlouboutinshoesstore.com/" rel="nofollow">Christian louboutin</a>! every post so far looks right up my alley. I just wanted to tell you that I love the site(s). Makes me smile and makes my day everyday. Better than master card, I never leave home with out my daily dose.great site like Christian louboutin! every post so far looks right up my alley.

]]> By: newbie http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-349328 newbie Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:22:52 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-349328 [quote comment="348950"]okay all these ads are totally messing with my lost mojo. Anyways i have a question,Why does everyone continue to say that Michale is Dead.when i bet indeed he and walt will have huge roles Michael Dawson could indeed have the role of the arch angel and save the losties because he had deep regret of what he did to them and gave his life on behalf of all of them.just like hmm the arch angel[/quote] miss.Awesome I like that theory of Michael being the arch angel especially how he went out on the ship. I always suspected Walt as being a major player on the island but as I look back at the earlier shows I'm not sure Walt is going to be a good player. I mean why did birds die around Walt? Why did he lead Shannon to her death ( that I did not mind )? January can't get here fast enough because I need some clarity on Walt's character. miss.Awesome wrote:

okay all these ads are totally messing with my lost mojo. Anyways i have a question,Why does everyone continue to say that Michale is Dead.when i bet indeed he and walt will have huge roles Michael Dawson could indeed have the role of the arch angel and save the losties because he had deep regret of what he did to them and gave his life on behalf of all of them.just like hmm the arch angel

miss.Awesome I like that theory of Michael being the arch angel especially how he went out on the ship. I always suspected Walt as being a major player on the island but as I look back at the earlier shows I’m not sure Walt is going to be a good player. I mean why did birds die around Walt? Why did he lead Shannon to her death ( that I did not mind )? January can’t get here fast enough because I need some clarity on Walt’s character.

]]> By: miss.Awesome http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-348950 miss.Awesome Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:47:14 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-348950 okay all these ads are totally messing with my lost mojo. Anyways i have a question,Why does everyone continue to say that Michale is Dead.when i bet indeed he and walt will have huge roles Michael Dawson could indeed have the role of the arch angel and save the losties because he had deep regret of what he did to them and gave his life on behalf of all of them.just like hmm the arch angel okay all these ads are totally messing with my lost mojo. Anyways i have a question,Why does everyone continue to say that Michale is Dead.when i bet indeed he and walt will have huge roles Michael Dawson could indeed have the role of the arch angel and save the losties because he had deep regret of what he did to them and gave his life on behalf of all of them.just like hmm the arch angel

]]> By: miss.Awesome http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-342589 miss.Awesome Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:18:31 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-342589 I was watching the yearly marathon of The twilight zone and boy was I getting punched with many lost relations .As we know the produces are heavily into ScFi and if ‘anybody who’s anybody ‘ claims to be a ScFi fan Im sure they are fans of Rod Sterling’s The Twilight Zone. I was always intrigued with Jack Tats, Jacks Family Blood Line, and of course Jacob and The Guy with the dark hair and black shirt perhaps (Nemesis) idk. Jack’s Tattoo always intrigued me because of the strong meaning associated with it and how the writers seemed to not speak about it anymore it as almost his tat is an Easter egg. “He walks amongst us, but he is not one of us.”Tying this statement to two other episode of the twilight zone perhaps gives us an explanation to the meaning. The episode they made my lost sense tingle was After Hours which was about a women who walks into a department store non- existent 9th floor where she purchases a gold thimble. She realizes its tarnished and wants to return it however when she goes to the customer service to make her complaint they inform her that there isn’t a 9th floor. After the shocking news that the 9th floor does not exist, She explains that a women helped her on the 9th floor, while she is explaining she sees the back of the women that helped her and runs up to her, only to realize that she is a mannequin the exact same women( this moment reminded me of when jack saw his father standing in the ocean idk) . a very unpleasant feeling comes over her and the staff at the department store allows her to lie down on a couch in a office in the back of the store. When she awakens she realizes that she is left in the store alone. (Perhaps this could be a comparison of Jack when we first see him in the pilot episode when he awakes alone in the jungle). She begins to become very frightened and begins to be startled by the mannequins in the room and starts to hear her name being whispered. (the jungle whispers hmm)Then she is stricken with fear she backs into a open elevator and it goes to the 9th floor when the elevator doors open and the same mannequin women is standing right there she the turn almost to human and all the other mannequins gather around the women and they tell her to remember and finally after they jog her memory she remembered that she was a mannequin and it was her turn to enter the real world and realized that she came back to late. Your probably wondering how this does all tie into our beloved show LOST. Well it does here. Remember How I mentioned Jacks Tattoo He Walks among us But HE Is Not One of US. Let’s think if Jacob was to get a tattoo by the same possessed women what do you think his would say? Perhaps his would say the same thing. Because remember Jacob and the man with the black shirt’s conversation ‘THEY come fight and Destroy’ clearly they are not talking about what or whoever they are because the man would have said we or used mankind instead of they. That being said and tying this with the twilight zone episode the women did not remember that she was what she was this means the She did not remember that she was a mannequin and also did not remember where she came from. She also built another life outside of her department store life she mentioned she was buying a gold thimble for her mother which means she made a whole new life for herself. Just like Jack could have done .Jack may not remember what he is or who he is or maybe Jack is like one half of something else and half of what everyone else is that isn’t the species that Jacob and his friend is. This answers the reason why Jacks grandfather did not want jack’s father to marry jacks mother Margo. Because he wanted Jack to be a pure breed and perhaps all the Losties the Jacob touched are of his species blood line. Idk but I notice quit a number of similarities in other episodes of the twilight zone which was the adam and eve episode. The monsters are on maple st. episode .Idk but Im starting to see what going on in Lost but this is only an aspect there are more pieces to the Lost puzzle. Your Equally Obsessed LosT FAN, Miss. Awesome I was watching the yearly marathon of The twilight zone and boy was I getting punched with many lost relations .As we know the produces are heavily into ScFi and if ‘anybody who’s anybody ‘ claims to be a ScFi fan Im sure they are fans of Rod Sterling’s The Twilight Zone.
I was always intrigued with Jack Tats, Jacks Family Blood Line, and of course Jacob and The Guy with the dark hair and black shirt perhaps (Nemesis) idk. Jack’s Tattoo always intrigued me because of the strong meaning associated with it and how the writers seemed to not speak about it anymore it as almost his tat is an Easter egg. “He walks amongst us, but he is not one of us.”Tying this statement to two other episode of the twilight zone perhaps gives us an explanation to the meaning. The episode they made my lost sense tingle was After Hours which was about a women who walks into a department store non- existent 9th floor where she purchases a gold thimble. She realizes its tarnished and wants to return it however when she goes to the customer service to make her complaint they inform her that there isn’t a 9th floor. After the shocking news that the 9th floor does not exist, She explains that a women helped her on the 9th floor, while she is explaining she sees the back of the women that helped her and runs up to her, only to realize that she is a mannequin the exact same women( this moment reminded me of when jack saw his father standing in the ocean idk) . a very unpleasant feeling comes over her and the staff at the department store allows her to lie down on a couch in a office in the back of the store. When she awakens she realizes that she is left in the store alone. (Perhaps this could be a comparison of Jack when we first see him in the pilot episode when he awakes alone in the jungle). She begins to become very frightened and begins to be startled by the mannequins in the room and starts to hear her name being whispered. (the jungle whispers hmm)Then she is stricken with fear she backs into a open elevator and it goes to the 9th floor when the elevator doors open and the same mannequin women is standing right there she the turn almost to human and all the other mannequins gather around the women and they tell her to remember and finally after they jog her memory she remembered that she was a mannequin and it was her turn to enter the real world and realized that she came back to late.
Your probably wondering how this does all tie into our beloved show LOST. Well it does here. Remember How I mentioned Jacks Tattoo He Walks among us But HE Is Not One of US. Let’s think if Jacob was to get a tattoo by the same possessed women what do you think his would say? Perhaps his would say the same thing. Because remember Jacob and the man with the black shirt’s conversation ‘THEY come fight and Destroy’ clearly they are not talking about what or whoever they are because the man would have said we or used mankind instead of they. That being said and tying this with the twilight zone episode the women did not remember that she was what she was this means the She did not remember that she was a mannequin and also did not remember where she came from. She also built another life outside of her department store life she mentioned she was buying a gold thimble for her mother which means she made a whole new life for herself. Just like Jack could have done .Jack may not remember what he is or who he is or maybe Jack is like one half of something else and half of what everyone else is that isn’t the species that Jacob and his friend is. This answers the reason why Jacks grandfather did not want jack’s father to marry jacks mother Margo. Because he wanted Jack to be a pure breed and perhaps all the Losties the Jacob touched are of his species blood line. Idk but I notice quit a number of similarities in other episodes of the twilight zone which was the adam and eve episode. The monsters are on maple st. episode .Idk but Im starting to see what going on in Lost but this is only an aspect there are more pieces to the Lost puzzle.
Your Equally Obsessed LosT FAN, Miss. Awesome

]]> By: ShelbyDee http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-342244 ShelbyDee Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:12:21 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-342244 I'm getting around to catching up with the blog now that it's summer. I have to say Macgyver always makes my head spin. But on the post previous to this one, Test wrote "fdfg" and being an old person I didn't recognize the shorthand so I Googled. Free dermal fat grafting? Really? I’m getting around to catching up with the blog now that it’s summer. I have to say Macgyver always makes my head spin. But on the post previous to this one, Test wrote “fdfg” and being an old person I didn’t recognize the shorthand so I Googled.

Free dermal fat grafting? Really?

]]> By: test http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-338706 test Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:40:35 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-338706 [quote comment="336871"]"I beginning to think this show simply can’t end AND answer all Our questions in one more season. We barely have any answers now." Indeed - I was just considering this too! Not only is there the gargantuan task of resolving the losties fates in the plot arc, but there are fundamental issues about The Others and wtf their purpose is - what is these guys' job, anyway besdies being grumpy and cryptic??? In the first season they were stealing children and killing passengers without mercy, hanging Charlie from a tree, kidnapping Cindy -- now we see them all following Locke like a troop of scouts on a hiking day trip, with all the sinister mystery removed. Why did they allow Dharma to exist but chose to visciously attack the poor Oceanic passengers so swiftly? Were they corrupted at some point and misguided into brutality just before the Dharma purge? And remember Smiling Tom being told that the disguises were no longer necessary by Ben on the dock - what was with that? Add to this the Charles Whidmore factor, the Elloise hawking factor, the Latin speaking "3rd party" factor, who was Sayid really exterminating for Ben.... and how does Walt, Aaron and the other kids stolen by The Others play into this (Tom tells Micahel Walt is "a very special boy"), and THE NUMBERS...... I just do not see how all that gets answered in just one more season - to do so every single minute of every episode is going to have to be jam packed with nothing but juiciness in the from of answers. has anyone esle heard anything further on a theatrical LOST release, or was that just sillliness?[/quote] fdfg shawn wrote:

“I beginning to think this show simply can’t end AND answer all Our questions in one more season. We barely have any answers now.”

Indeed – I was just considering this too! Not only is there the gargantuan task of resolving the losties fates in the plot arc, but there are fundamental issues about The Others and wtf their purpose is – what is these guys’ job, anyway besdies being grumpy and cryptic??? In the first season they were stealing children and killing passengers without mercy, hanging Charlie from a tree, kidnapping Cindy — now we see them all following Locke like a troop of scouts on a hiking day trip, with all the sinister mystery removed. Why did they allow Dharma to exist but chose to visciously attack the poor Oceanic passengers so swiftly? Were they corrupted at some point and misguided into brutality just before the Dharma purge? And remember Smiling Tom being told that the disguises were no longer necessary by Ben on the dock – what was with that? Add to this the Charles Whidmore factor, the Elloise hawking factor, the Latin speaking “3rd party” factor, who was Sayid really exterminating for Ben…. and how does Walt, Aaron and the other kids stolen by The Others play into this (Tom tells Micahel Walt is “a very special boy”), and THE NUMBERS…… I just do not see how all that gets answered in just one more season – to do so every single minute of every episode is going to have to be jam packed with nothing but juiciness in the from of answers.

has anyone esle heard anything further on a theatrical LOST release, or was that just sillliness?

fdfg

]]> By: MacGyver http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-338040 MacGyver Fri, 29 May 2009 14:59:55 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-338040 THanks Pauric & Shawn, made my day. Seriously, there are very few people who agree with the basics of this theory. That's ok with me though, I 'd rather gloat with the elite minority come sixth season premier. I'm With YOU THE WHOLE WAY PAURIC! Either they TT top their childhood, or their on that damn boat ;-) I truly hope they aren't on it though. I REALLY want john to be the reincarnated captain Magnus!! It has to be!! ;-) I've got this awesome theory about the island BTW. I'm gonna post very soon.... THanks Pauric & Shawn, made my day. Seriously, there are very few people who agree with the basics of this theory. That’s ok with me though, I ‘d rather gloat with the elite minority come sixth season premier. I’m With YOU THE WHOLE WAY PAURIC! Either they TT top their childhood, or their on that damn boat ;-) I truly hope they aren’t on it though. I REALLY want john to be the reincarnated captain Magnus!! It has to be!! ;-)

I’ve got this awesome theory about the island BTW. I’m gonna post very soon….

]]> By: shawn http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying/comment-page-1#comment-336871 shawn Fri, 22 May 2009 20:44:13 +0000 http://www.lostblog.net/lost/tv/show/a-theory-on-dying#comment-336871 "I beginning to think this show simply can’t end AND answer all Our questions in one more season. We barely have any answers now." Indeed - I was just considering this too! Not only is there the gargantuan task of resolving the losties fates in the plot arc, but there are fundamental issues about The Others and wtf their purpose is - what is these guys' job, anyway besdies being grumpy and cryptic??? In the first season they were stealing children and killing passengers without mercy, hanging Charlie from a tree, kidnapping Cindy -- now we see them all following Locke like a troop of scouts on a hiking day trip, with all the sinister mystery removed. Why did they allow Dharma to exist but chose to visciously attack the poor Oceanic passengers so swiftly? Were they corrupted at some point and misguided into brutality just before the Dharma purge? And remember Smiling Tom being told that the disguises were no longer necessary by Ben on the dock - what was with that? Add to this the Charles Whidmore factor, the Elloise hawking factor, the Latin speaking "3rd party" factor, who was Sayid really exterminating for Ben.... and how does Walt, Aaron and the other kids stolen by The Others play into this (Tom tells Micahel Walt is "a very special boy"), and THE NUMBERS...... I just do not see how all that gets answered in just one more season - to do so every single minute of every episode is going to have to be jam packed with nothing but juiciness in the from of answers. has anyone esle heard anything further on a theatrical LOST release, or was that just sillliness? “I beginning to think this show simply can’t end AND answer all Our questions in one more season. We barely have any answers now.”

Indeed – I was just considering this too! Not only is there the gargantuan task of resolving the losties fates in the plot arc, but there are fundamental issues about The Others and wtf their purpose is – what is these guys’ job, anyway besdies being grumpy and cryptic??? In the first season they were stealing children and killing passengers without mercy, hanging Charlie from a tree, kidnapping Cindy — now we see them all following Locke like a troop of scouts on a hiking day trip, with all the sinister mystery removed. Why did they allow Dharma to exist but chose to visciously attack the poor Oceanic passengers so swiftly? Were they corrupted at some point and misguided into brutality just before the Dharma purge? And remember Smiling Tom being told that the disguises were no longer necessary by Ben on the dock – what was with that? Add to this the Charles Whidmore factor, the Elloise hawking factor, the Latin speaking “3rd party” factor, who was Sayid really exterminating for Ben…. and how does Walt, Aaron and the other kids stolen by The Others play into this (Tom tells Micahel Walt is “a very special boy”), and THE NUMBERS…… I just do not see how all that gets answered in just one more season – to do so every single minute of every episode is going to have to be jam packed with nothing but juiciness in the from of answers.

has anyone esle heard anything further on a theatrical LOST release, or was that just sillliness?

]]>